Monday, May 24, 2010
Slaying Chinglish
Andrew Jacobs writes in the New York Times about the confusion caused in China by street signs and other public messages for non-Chinese speakers. The translation is often done using an automatic program or by someone without knowledge of English idioms. The result is a ubiquity of awkward wording that does not get the message across. While translations like "fatso" or "lard bucket" for extra large clothing may be amusing, for many Chinese officials they are very embarrassing. The Shanghai Commission for Language Use has been trying to clean up these Chinese malapropisms, with a plan modeled after Beijing’s efficient fixing of English signs for the 2008 Olympics. Unfortunately, the Shanghai Commission’s original due date, the beginning of the Shanghai Expo, has already come and passed. Wang Xioming, an English scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, was spurred to action by the laughter of her foreign colleagues. Zhao Huimin says that translation errors undermine the intended utility of signs. Regardless of the reasons of esteemed officials, lovers of "Chinglish" are upset at the future changes. Oliver Lutz Radtke, who is actually pursuing a doctoral degree in Chinglish at the University of Heidelberg, says that without such malapropisms, a "window into the Chinese mind" would be lost. Jeffery Yao, although he himself is following government directives to properly translate signs, offers the custom of anthropomorphizing nature in park signs, as an indicator of Chinese "expressive" translation. An example of this would be “The Little Grass Is Sleeping. Please Don’t Disturb It” or “Don’t Hurt Me. I Am Afraid of Pain" instead of the Western “Keep Off the Grass."
This reflects China's growing international interactions and the subsequent effect of globalization on China's cultural landscape. It also reveals a slight cultural cleavage between traditionalism and Westernization. This is important because it is a sign of growing foreign investment in China; such growing capitalism may also potentially help to liberalize politics in the future. Nevertheless, the article did indirectly mention China's still strict political culture when it said that businesses do not dare to ignore the government’s suggested translation improvements.
View more pictures of Chinese-to-English malapropisms.
Grade this post.
(Photos from the NYT)
Friday, May 21, 2010
Swinging activity spurs controversy over privacy in the Chinese home

As reported by a May 20th New York Times article, a Chinese computer science professor in Nanjing Institute of Technology has been accused of "crowd licentiousness" with a sentence of three and a half years in prison. Allegedly Ma Yaohai, 53, has participated in several activities classified under the term of "hooliganism," including partner swapping and group sex. Prosecutors have claimed that he held at least 18 orgies in his two bedroom apartment which he shares with his elderly mother. Ma along with 21 other swingers were arrested and prosecuted, but he was the only swinger who spoke out against the charges, which he will contest later in court, claiming that the accusations are his own private concern: "How can I disturb social order? What occurs in my house is a private matter." Apparently, deviant sexual activity now constitutes a violation of the Chinese political ideology. Ma had set up a sex chat room for other swingers to facilitate swinging activity in China. Several bloggers have spoken out against the government's prosecution of the case due to the infringement on the sexual freedoms of Chinese citizens.
This article demonstrates comparative government concepts because of the debate over the government's lack of respect for its citizens' privacy. The role of the national government in China clearly plays a large role in the individual roles of citizens. This case also demonstrates the continued role of Confucianism in Chinese society, as citizens are expected to compose themselves with propriety. This emphasizes the traditional aspect of Chinese society that has greatly impacted how the Chinese government operates.
Grade This Post
Photo credit: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asia_pacific/10136210.stm
A worthy use of toxic chemicals

Sunday, May 16, 2010
China quake activist sentenced on subversion charges
Mass killings in schools spread in China

According to a May 13th article by the Economist, a series of attacks on Chinese elementary students has broken out after an initial attack early in March. As guns are near impossible for civilians to attain, the weapons used by the attackers are predominantly knives, which they have used to severely injure and kill several Chinese elementary school children. After the first attack, several "copy-cat" incidents have occurred across China. Chinese officials have been granted the power to kill these attackers on the spot in several provinces, and security patrols have been heightened to prevent any more attempts. The perpetrators of these attacks are said to be mentally-ill Chinese citizens. Observers have contemplated the idea that the motives of the murderers may stem from frustration with the government which they have taken out on the weak. A British medical journal reported that less than 10% of Chinese mental patients do not receive treatment. The Chinese government has been predictably tight-lipped concerning the attacks, as a measure to cover up the violence (which has occurred at a most inopportune time, due to the ongoing Shanghai World Expo) and prevent further copy-cat attempts.
These killings have presented China with a challenge in terms of national security. The government's swift response to the attacks demonstrates great efficiency of the Chinese government, which is due to the concentration of power within the Politburo and its Standing Committee. The use of knives reflects China's strict ban on gun use. The media's limited response to the attacks demonstrates the government's control on information flow (a corporatist system) and a lack of transparency in reporting events. The lack of treatment for mental patients reveals a problem within the health care system and an issue in public policy.
Photo credit: http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/05/15/china.kindergarten.attack/index.html?iref=allsearch
Grade This Post
Friday, May 14, 2010
What's for dinner?

Sunday, May 9, 2010
AIDS Activist Leaves China After Government Pressure
Edward Wong of the New York Times reports that, Wan Yanhai has left China for the U.S. with his family in order to better continue his work as an AIDS activist. Wan is the founder of a prominent AIDS activist group, the Aizhixing Institute (Bejjing), which had been the subject of increasing governmental pressure. Kate Krauss, Wan's friend and director of the AIDS Policy Project, said that it became "impossible for Wan Yanhai to remain in China" because of the government. The governmental pressures include scrutiny from the tax agencies. The tax officials were not local, but rather unusually, from a municipical authority. Wan's office was even investigated by the fire department, apparently to ensure the office was in line with fire safety codes. It is important to note that Wan is extremely notable in AIDS campaigning in China, and has, in fact, dealt with the government before. Aizhixing was founded in 1994, a time when AIDS was not spoken about much publicly. In 2002, Wan was detained for four weeks because of pointing his finger in the mid-'90s to the government’s negligence the cause of an HIV spread in Henan Province villages.
The inquiries on Wan are not isolated; they come at a time of increased inspection on all civil society groups -- particularly those that receive foreign investment. The vitality of grassroots organizations in an important indicator of the health of citizen-state relations. The fact that Wan had to relocate to Philadelphia in order to continue his activism is not a promising sign for the global legitimacy of the Chinese government. Also, in the last year, administrative pressure has been a method of pressure on civil society groups. For example, in July 2009, Gongmeng, a legal research organization in Beijing, was shut down and a leader detained after an investigation by tax officials.
Friday, May 7, 2010
Kim Jong Il pays clandestine visit to northern China

Photo credit: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/06/world/asia/06beijing.html?ref=asia
Grade This Post
Issues Related to Rural to Urband Migration

Sunday, April 4, 2010
Chengguan's thuggish behavior gets out of hand in China's cities
A March 31 article in The Economist reported an outbreak of civilian violence in the city of Kunming in response to the attack on an illegal street vendor by the chengguan, a lower sector of the Chinese police force with a reputation for thuggish behavior. The chengguan is reputed to be responsible for several crackdowns on mildly illegal activity within cities like illegal solicitation and house demolition. There have been several examples of the chengguan's brutish behavior when dealing with urban issues, such as the 2008 killing of a man attempting to film a group of Chinese officers halting a rural protest against chemical waste. Several urban workers have been beaten to the point of brain damage or death for activities such as utilizing a bicycle as an illegal taxi or peddling wares on the street. There has been a strong outbreak of protest among university students and homeowners protesting house demolition, and even law professors have appealed to the Chinese legislative body to curb the authority of the chengguan. In response to the Kunming incident, the press took varying stances, with the government's account that the violence was "a lie," dissent against the brutal nature of the chengguan, and criticism of the Kunming officials for releasing minimal details of the outbreak.The growing resentment to the thuggish authority of the chengguan indicates the Chinese people coming to question the legitimacy of their local governmental bodies, and as a result, the party's interests for their people. The strain between Beijing and the local government presents the challenges of the Chinese government to control such a populous and large nation. The shady nature of chengguan dealings tarnishes the Chinese government's legitimacy and demonstrates a lack of transparency within the party regime. As unrest has moved from the countryside to within the cities, the added stressors on the government may prove to be too much to resist political change.
Photo credit: fredalix, http://www.flickr.com/photos/fredalix/3877604826/
Grade This Post
Sunday, March 28, 2010
China's Problem With Housing Market Speculators

In a recent Economist article titled "China mulls a property tax: An odd sort of tax," China's struggle with rising housing costs was discussed.The country is currently experiencing a surge in property pricing, that was"helped by a torrent of carefree lending from state-run banks." There are now signs that sales are dropping due to this increase in prices caused by speculators.
The government is already fighting this trend by raising "down-payment requirements for second homes and the reimposition of a sales tax for properties sold within five years." The NPC, however, believes that a property tax may help prevent "speculators from hoarding empty property and help bring prices down." Some also believe it could help get rid of corruption in local governments.
The government has been running simulations to test the effect of the proposed law, but the local governments dislike the idea. Reducing property prices would hurt cities that sell land to developers. However, some want to law to apply to larger properties, but not residential, because most of the problems are being seen with speculators, and not the average Chinese citizen, but this will not please the cities because it will still affect the majority of their land sales.
Many believe that a property tax would not do much to slow the rising property prices "because of China's huge demand for housing as it urbanizes." The new law could improve government services by giving property owners reason to demand more from their government.
This proposed law can increase the legitimacy of China's local and national governments by reducing corruption and increasing the demand for government responsibility to property owners. It will also affect the economy, yet that part of the decision is still the most hotly debated part of the discussing, but will most likely stop a housing price increase that is remarkably similar to what happened in the US housing market recently.
"Grade This Post"
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Official in China Says Western-Style Democracy Won’t Take Root There

Li Fei's interview was originally published online by China Daily. Read it here.
Article Source
Photo Source
Grade This Post - Extra Credit
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Rare Outspoken Reform Call From China State Media
''Freedom of movement is a human right."
-- Removed Editorial
Workers Rights in China?

In a recent Economist article titled "Core and Periphery," Apple's finds in its own internal audits were used to better understand workers rights in China. Apple usually keeps very tight controls on the companies that assemble its products, and will audit them from time to time. With a recent audit, they discovered something they were not very happy with.
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Wen announces staggering decrease in military budget growth rate

According to a March 5 article from from The Economist, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao announced at the first day of the annual National People's Congress a mere 7.5% increase in military spending, down from 17.8% last year. Amid tensions due to recent arms sales to Taiwan by American manufacturers, this figure was quite unexpected, as most analysts were expecting an increase well above 10%. In fact, the Chinese government has not offered such a low increase in the military budget in the past 20 years. The rest of the world is left to ponder this sudden double take in the Chinese military budget: perhaps the government expects difficult times, despite China's relative success in the recession, perhaps the government sincerely is attempting to ameliorate its menacing image as a military threat. Pentagon analysts assert that China's military accounts have traditionally shortchanged the number of yuan spent on the military budget. For example, last year China declared a budget of $60 billion, while American estimates range from $105 to $150 billion. However, this year's shockingly low increase should not be cast aside. China could have easily declared a increase of as high as 20%, further reinforcing strained relations with neighboring countries such as Taiwan. The new figure also demonstrates a new air of caution that Beijing has taken in response to tell-tale signs of a possible housing crisis and the wearing off of stimulus cash. Either way, the reduced military estimate bodes well for foreign powers looking for a friendlier relationship with China.
This shift in economic measures demonstrates China's increasing insecurity about its future economic performance. Although China boasts a economic growth rate of 8+%, as Prime Minister Wen was only too quick to point out in his two hour speech, this withdrawal in military spending indicates that Chinese leaders are taking greater measures to preserve this economic prosperity by cutting down in the annual military fiscal increase. The lower rate of increase also shines a light on China's efforts to improve international relations. International figures have obviously had some effect on China's image, and Chinese leaders are clearly willing to work on their common perception as a major military threat. The question of legitimacy also arises when discussing whether these figures will be upheld, as in the past China's military estimates are much lower than their actual value. The Economist calls the Chinese budgets "opaque," emphasizing the lack of transparency when declaring military spending, calling the authenticity of the figures cited by the National People's Congress into question.
Photo source: Remko Tanis, http://www.flickr.com/photos/remkotanis/4408321612/
Grade This Post
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Factory Labor Shortage in China
“You can walk into any factory and get a job."
This statement by a 22 year old plastics worker would not be true in the current American economic situtation. However, as reported in the New York Times yesterday by Keith Bradsher, China is facing an growing labor shortage for several reasons. Factory wages have risen by as much as 20% in recent months, telemarketers are spending their time cold-calling random people to offer them jobs instead of calling customers, and some manufacterors are closing down production lines because of a lack of workers. The main cause for this shortage is that China once drained its interior population to find workers for the blossoming factories in the coastal areas. Now, after a major stimulus from the Chinese government to create jobs in the interior, many workers are not returning to the coast after going home for the Lunar New Year. Two other impacting trends are the rapid exspansion of higher education -- which decreases the number of people looking for factory jobs -- and the One Child Policy.
This shortage has the potential to impact Americans because of the possiblity of higher priced imported goods from China, as the minimum wage might be increased and many bonuses are being offered. Unfortuntely, in the past, higher wages have resulted in inflation for the Chinese economy. The article also reveals a decreasing regional cleavage between the coastal and interior regions. Where the coastal regions were once the economic center, more and more jobs are being created in the interior, often due to government projects like rail and highway construction. Social cleavages are also briefly discussed in the article as those normally accustomed to "white-collar," desk jobs are being forced to participate in more hard labor. However, the Chinese labor shortage could also be a positive factor for the Obama Administration in the renminbi-dollar negotiations.
Article/Photo Source
Grade This Post
Trade Disputes

In a recent Economist article titled "When Partners Attack," the reporter commented on the fact that China is now the leading exporter, beating out Germany in 2009, and was involved in exactly half of the disputes filed with the World Trade Organization.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Shanghai pushes for financial dominance

The approaching 2010 Shanghai World Expo raises the question of the financial future of China's Special Economic Zone, according to a February 24 New York Times article. Shanghai investment firms have recently looked to improving infrastructure to attract greater foreign investment and also keep mainland Chinese financial workers from leaving for Hong Kong for jobs. The China State Council has officially appointed Shanghai as the financial capital of the country, and to put the city on the map as a fiscally influential city. The government has been quick to spend whatever needed to make Shanghai an attractive center of investment, leading up to the creation of the World Expo to be held later in this year. Among the changes to be put in place in Shanghai's financial community are a lessening of taxation and currency restrictions, both indicators of China's growing liberalization of the economy. Recent investment ventures by foreign investment group Blackstone Group included environmental and energy initiatives in and around Shanghai, demonstrating the joint involvement of domestic and foreign financial firms.
Shanghai's new economic initiatives most obviously serve as an example of trends of economic change. With China close to the second largest economy in the world, it would be natural for Beijing to loosen the governmental restrictions in Shanghai to promote foreign investment. By opening up Shanghai to the rest of the financial world, China has demonstrated a growing focus in the private sector. This shift towards economic liberalization has brought about several public policy changes in infrastructure, economic liberties (specifically applied to Shanghai as a Special Economic Zone), and social welfare to attract more financial workers, who often go overseas or to Hong Kong. By building up Shanghai's economic performance, the Chinese government is working towards promoting domestic interests while attracting foreign interests. The need for greater foreign investment shows the onset of globalization, especially in cases such as China's, an economic powerhouse that depends heavily on the fiscal participation of other nations. China's willingness to privatize sectors of the Shanghai economy illustrates the huge impact of foreign companies' needs in order to do business in China.
Photo source: "riggslau," www.flickr.com/photos/riggslau
Grade This Post
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Repression
In a recent Economist article titled "What are they afraid of?", the author delved into the topic of China's repressive policies. China Intensifies Tug of War With India on Nepal
Jim Yardley wrote last week in the New York Times about the shifting foreign relations power structure in Nepal. The article discusses China's growing importance in the world and in South Asia, a region traditionally dominated by India. Nepal is situated between China and India, the two most populous countries in the world. The Himalayas have always been a solid physical barrier between China and Nepal, while the many cultural and economic ties to India have created a historical connection between India and Nepal. However, with the growing presence of China in the global sphere, it is very important for small nations like Nepal to keep good relations with the Chinese government. From the other side, Nepal appeared on China's radar during Tibetan protests erupted in March 2008, just months before the Beijing Olympic Games. While the Chinese government was able to block the international media from the protests in Tibet itself, the Nepali protests attracted much international attention. Ashok Gurung, director of the India China Institute at The New School, says that "the Chinese realized that Nepal is going to be an important site where they could potentially be embarrassed on Tibetan issues." Nepal is an important place in Tibetan issues because it has historically been a tacit transit for Tibetans to cross over to India for pilgrimages or higher education. For India's part, the country is not worried about economic competition so much as the threat of “political agitation on the Nepalese side of their shared border, as well as the possibility that terrorists trained in Pakistan could transit through Nepal."
This is an important illustration of China's growing strength in the world. Not only has China been strengthening ties with Nepal, with which it has the Tibet issue, it has been rapidly signing agreements with even the tiniest of South Asian countries like the Maldives. This signifies China's growing awareness of the importance of preemptively beneficial international treaties. Furthermore, the China-Nepal situation is evidence of China's continued antagonism of their Tibetan population. Tenzin Taklha, the secretary for the Dalai Lama, says that the China-Nepal agreements -- which include the stationing of Nepali armed police officers in isolated regions like Mustang and Manang on the border with Tibet and more security and vigilance on both sides of the border -- makes things "more difficult for Tibetans."
Grade This Post






